On 31/07/2026 2:01 AM, Poetic Knight wrote:
How presumptuous of you, and what a dickish tone you either deliberately took or else have as a default.If you read my latest three posts, it culminates with calling Herman out for still applying censor via modifying the post buoyancy. In tandem with my public apology and effort to extend an olive branch and to strive for better discourse, his latest move to adjust post visibility will make him look questionable, as others will now lose confidence in what deserves to be on the feed.
It's taking the long view, but people like you feel the need to have a certain brand of edgy anarchy to feel good about themselves, right?
-------- Original Message --------
On Thursday, 07/30/26 at 17:49 unstory <no@unstory.eu> wrote:
Hi,You wrote the sharp article that landed. Then you apologized in two lengthy HR articles and spread the love and showing rainbow above.
"I was a bit pretentious and aggressive." "I got salty." "I own that."
Then master apologizes for censoring you and asks you to empathize with his censorship. And you? "Fair and cordial message." ;/ The censored thanks the censor. Absurd.
Herman hides the jab but keeps several follow-ups. The platform thrives on it.
And you? Left one cage and immediately apologized to the next one.
Sometimes something leaks out. That was your original post. The rest is fear and performance.
--
unstory
https://unstory.eu/